ncloud_cdss_create_config_group

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description indicates a write operation ('Create'), but annotations only provide destructiveHint=false, so no contradiction. However, there is no disclosure of additional behavioral traits like idempotency, duplicate handling, or required permissions. Given sparse annotations, the description adds minimal transparency beyond the basic action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is a single sentence of 11 words, immediately clear and front-loaded. No unnecessary content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Although the schema covers parameters, the description lacks context about the CDSS service, what a config group is used for, and what the tool returns (no output schema). An AI agent may need more context to use it correctly, especially given the large set of sibling tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema covers all 3 parameters with descriptions (configGroupName, kafkaVersionCode, description), achieving 100% schema coverage. The description adds no extra meaning or constraints beyond what the schema provides, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Create a new Config Group for CDSS cluster configuration', specifying the verb (create), resource (config group), and context (CDSS cluster). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like list, get, and delete.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not indicate prerequisites, such as needing a cluster or existing config groups, nor does it mention when to avoid using it (e.g., if a group already exists).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.