ncloud_gtm_create_geo_cidr_map

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare destructiveHint: false, so the description adds no extra behavioral context. It doesn't mention side effects (e.g., overwriting existing maps), error conditions, or quotas. The description merely states the creation action without disclosing limitations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, front-loaded with the core action. It is concise without wasted words. However, it could be slightly expanded to include context about what a map is used for without being verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema and 3 required parameters, the description is too minimal. It doesn't explain the purpose of Geo/CIDR maps in GTM or how they relate to other GTM components like profiles or policies, leaving gaps for an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with each parameter described in the schema. The tool description does not add any additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create' and the resource 'Geo or CIDR map for Global Traffic Manager'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like list, get, update, and delete maps by specifying the creation action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide when-to-use guidance or alternatives. It lacks information on prerequisites (e.g., needing a GTM profile) or when to choose GEO vs CIDR. No exclusions or context about dependencies with other tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.