ncloud_nks_get_access_entry

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=true, so the safe-read profile is already covered. The description adds that this is a single-item UUID lookup, but says nothing about returned fields, permissions, or sensitivity of IAM access entry data, so it adds only modest context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short sentence that front-loads the verb and resource with zero filler. Every clause earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only get-by-UUID with no output schema and readOnlyHint already present, the description is nearly sufficient. It could optionally state what an access entry contains or any permission requirements, but an agent has enough to call it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both clusterUuid and entryUuid are already documented in the schema. The description's 'of an NKS cluster' and 'by its UUID' merely restate those parameters without adding format, sourcing, or validation detail.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('one IAM access entry of an NKS cluster') and adds the lookup key ('by its UUID'). This clearly distinguishes it from the sibling ncloud_nks_list_access_entries and from create/update/delete variants.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no when-to-use guidance or alternatives; it never points to ncloud_nks_list_access_entries as the way to obtain the required entryUuid, nor says when a direct fetch is preferable. Usage is only implied by the singular 'Get one'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.