ncloud_sourcecommit_create_repo

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate non-destructive behavior. The description adds the dryRun preview feature, which is a key behavioral detail. However, it does not explain other behaviors like idempotency or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, consisting of two short sentences with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded with the primary action and then a practical tip.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 5 parameters and no output schema, the description provides the core function but lacks details on return values, error conditions, or prerequisites. It is adequate but minimal for a creation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents all 5 parameters with descriptions (100% coverage). The description does not add any extra meaning beyond mentioning dryRun, so it meets the baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create' and the resource 'new SourceCommit repository'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like edit_repo or delete_repo by focusing on creation. The dryRun hint adds specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a usage tip for dryRun but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like edit_repo or list_repos. It does not state prerequisites or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.