ncloud_sens_get_project

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, and the description's 'Get' is consistent with that. It adds minimal behavioral context, such as mentioning channel service IDs in the response, but does not describe return structure or any edge cases. Given the annotation coverage, this is adequate but not enriched.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence that front-loads the action and includes the API endpoint. No wasted words; it is appropriately concise for a simple GET operation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter read operation with readOnlyHint annotation and full schema coverage, the description is nearly complete. It mentions the key response detail (channel service IDs) and the endpoint. The lack of an output schema is acceptable given the tool's simplicity, though a bit more on expected fields would be ideal.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the schema already documents projectId with a helpful source hint. The description does not add extra parameter semantics beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'one SENS project', with an added detail about channel service IDs. It is distinguishable from list operations like ncloud_sens_list_projects by its singular scope, though it does not explicitly contrast with siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies it is for fetching a single project, and the parameter description indicates the ID comes from ncloud_sens_list_projects, but it does not explicitly state when to prefer this over alternatives or provide exclusion criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.