ui_get_element

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explains that the tool re-resolves element bounds/state, but does not disclose potential failure modes (e.g., element no longer exists), or whether it issues a new UI query. With no annotations, more detail would be beneficial.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that conveys the core purpose without any extraneous information. It is appropriately concise and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no parameters and a straightforward purpose, the description provides sufficient context. No output schema exists, but the return value is implied by the description (updated element_ref). It is adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, so the description does not need to add parameter meanings. It is clear and sufficient for the no-parameter case.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool re-resolves a previously returned element_ref to update its bounds/state. This distinguishes it from siblings like ui_find_element (which finds new elements) and ui_click (which interacts with elements).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when an element may have changed state, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like ui_find_element, nor does it mention prerequisites or conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.