pdf_read
Extract and read text content from PDF files. Access PDF document text for further processing or display.
Instructions
Read text content from a PDF file
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Extract and read text content from PDF files. Access PDF document text for further processing or display.
Read text content from a PDF file
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations; description does not disclose whether password-protected PDFs, scanned pages, or large files are handled. Only states 'Read text content' without behavioral nuances.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded with key information, no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema or annotations, the description is minimal. It covers the basic purpose but lacks details on return format, error scenarios, and supported PDF features.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema has zero parameters, so no documentation is needed. Description adds no parameter info, which is acceptable.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'read' and resource 'PDF file', differentiating from sibling tools like excel_read and word_read.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., for OCR needs or protected PDFs), only implied by the phrase 'from a PDF file'.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lanchuske/local-mcp-releases'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server