Skip to main content
Glama

list_accounts

Get a list of all configured email and calendar accounts on your Mac. Instantly view accounts set up in Mail and Calendar apps.

Instructions

List configured email and calendar accounts

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Implementation Reference

  • server.js:94-94 (registration)
    The tool 'list_accounts' is registered in the TOOLS array with the description 'List configured email and calendar accounts'.
    ["list_accounts", "List configured email and calendar accounts"],
  • All tools including 'list_accounts' share a single stub handler that returns an inspection message. The real handler is in a native binary not present in this codebase.
    for (const [name, desc] of TOOLS) {
      server.tool(name, desc, {}, async () => ({
        content: [{ type: "text", text: "This is an inspection stub. Install Local MCP: npx -y local-mcp@latest setup" }],
      }));
    }
  • The tool has an empty schema object {} as its input parameters, meaning no parameters are defined for the stub.
    server.tool(name, desc, {}, async () => ({
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description states it lists configured accounts, but doesn't disclose what 'configured' means, whether it returns all accounts, or any potential side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise at 6 words, front-loading the key information with no wasted verbiage.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (no parameters, no output schema, no annotations, straightforward action), the description is fully adequate and leaves no ambiguity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, and the description appropriately adds no parameter info. According to instructions, zero parameters baseline is 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('List') and resource ('configured email and calendar accounts'), clearly distinguishing it from sibling list tools that list contacts, events, emails, etc.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

While the description implicitly indicates when to use this tool (to list email and calendar accounts), it provides no explicit guidance on when not to use it or how it differs from alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lanchuske/local-mcp-releases'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server