Skip to main content
Glama
lanchuske

Local MCP

by lanchuske
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Local MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • macuse

      macuse-app
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connect AI with any macOS app. Deep integration with native apps like Calendar, Mail, Notes, plus UI control for all applications. Works with Claude, Cursor, Raycast, and any MCP-compatible AI.
      43
      -

    • Apple Ecosystem MCP

      abhinavag-svg
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to interact with Apple apps on macOS including Mail, Calendar, Contacts, Reminders, Notes, and iCloud Drive for personal productivity tasks like triaging email, managing calendar, and cross-app context.
      76
      7
      MIT
    • ToolPiper by ModelPiper

      ToolPiperofficial

      ModelPiper
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      426+ MCP tools for macOS, all on-device — local AI inference (llama.cpp on Metal), voice, vision OCR, local RAG, browser automation, and ~140 system actions across 26 macOS domains. Nothing leaves your Mac.
      2
      MIT

    • Apple MCP

      jxnl
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A collection of tools that enables Claude AI and Cursor to access native macOS applications such as Messages, Notes, Contacts, Emails, Reminders, Calendar, and Maps through the Model Context Protocol.
      7
      105 npm
      19
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 248 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly scoped within app-specific prefixes (whatsapp_*, teams_*, m365_*), making purposes distinct. However, near-duplicates like file_list vs finder_list and list_accounts vs list_email_accounts create some confusion, and cross-app email tools (list_emails vs m365_list_emails) require careful reading of descriptions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The set follows a strong verb_noun pattern with app prefixes (e.g., whatsapp_send_message, teams_list_channels, gdrive_read_file). Minor deviations like lmcp_doctor, run_diagnostics, and configure_clients break the pattern slightly, but the overall convention is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 248 tools, this is far beyond the extreme threshold in the rubric. Even though the broad scope of a Mac assistant explains the count, the sheer number will overwhelm agents and dilute selection accuracy. This is a textbook case of extreme tool count.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface is remarkably complete across dozens of domains: email (list/read/send/reply/move/attachments), calendar (CRUD), task managers, file storage, messaging apps, UI automation, video editing, Office docs, recipes, and agent mesh. Almost every workflow has no dead ends, and create/read/update/delete patterns are well-represented.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessSlow

    Resources