finder_search
Search for files on your Mac using Spotlight indexing. Locate documents, images, and other files by querying the local index.
Instructions
Search files using Spotlight
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Search for files on your Mac using Spotlight indexing. Locate documents, images, and other files by querying the local index.
Search files using Spotlight
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, description carries full burden. Only states mechanism (Spotlight) without disclosing side effects, output format, or constraints like indexing lag. Insufficient for safe invocation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, perfectly concise with no redundancy. Every word adds meaning.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, and description omits return type (e.g., file paths, names, or interactive results). Incomplete for an agent to understand what happens after invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0 parameters, baseline is 4. Description adds no parameter info, but none needed. Could explicitly confirm 'No parameters required' but not necessary.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Identifies the action (Search) and resource (files) and method (Spotlight). Clear, but does not explicitly differentiate from siblings like finder_list or other search tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as search_contacts or finder_list. Agent must infer context from tool name alone.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lanchuske/local-mcp-releases'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server