onedrive_file_info
Retrieve metadata for a OneDrive file or folder, including size, type, and timestamps, to confirm document properties.
Instructions
Get file or folder metadata
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve metadata for a OneDrive file or folder, including size, type, and timestamps, to confirm document properties.
Get file or folder metadata
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description does not disclose any side effects, authentication needs, or error behavior. It is opaque.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise: 5 words. It is front-loaded and to the point. Could be slightly more informative without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, no parameter explanation, and no annotations. The description does not cover what metadata is returned or potential errors, making it incomplete for the agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has zero parameters, so the description correctly requires no additional parameter semantics. Baseline of 4 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (get metadata) and resource (file or folder). However, among siblings like onedrive_read_file or onedrive_list_files, it does not differentiate.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like onedrive_read_file or onedrive_search_files. Without context, the agent may misuse it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lanchuske/local-mcp-releases'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server