recipe_export

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It mentions 'single portable token' but fails to describe token format, length, or whether the export has side effects (e.g., deleting the original). The incomplete sentence leaves out important details about what exactly the token is.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise but ends abruptly as an incomplete sentence. It is front-loaded with the main action, but the cut-off detracts from proper structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no parameters and no output schema, the description is mostly sufficient. However, the incomplete sentence leaves the explanation hanging, and the token's nature is not fully described, creating a minor completeness gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, and schema description coverage is 100% by default. Per guidelines, baseline is 4. The description adds meaning by explaining the action, but the cut-off prevents full context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool exports a saved SKILL (recipe) as a single portable token for sharing. This verb+resource combination distinguishes it from sibling tools like recipe_import (import token) and recipe_list (list recipes). The incomplete sentence does not hinder understanding the primary purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is used to create a shareable token, but it does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives (e.g., recipe_get for details). No guidance on when not to use or prerequisites is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.