project_templates_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description discloses the returned information and implies a read-only operation, but does not explicitly mention permissions, side effects, or rate limits. However, for a simple GET tool, this is largely sufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-structured with main description, workflow tips, common use cases, and example. Every sentence adds value, and critical information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers all necessary details: what it does, what it returns, how to use it, and an example. No gaps given the tool's simplicity and absence of output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter 'id', already fully described in input schema. Description adds no additional semantic meaning beyond what schema provides. Baseline 3 due to 100% schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool gets details of a single project template by ID, specifies the returned content (structure, phases, groups, tasks, and activities), and distinguishes from sibling tools like project_templates_list by explaining its specific use.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit workflow tips and common use cases, tells when to use (inspect before creating a project) and mentions alternative (projects/create) for creating from template.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.