activities_delete
Delete a specific activity from Pipedrive by providing its unique ID to remove unwanted or outdated records.
Instructions
Delete an activity by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Activity ID |
Delete a specific activity from Pipedrive by providing its unique ID to remove unwanted or outdated records.
Delete an activity by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Activity ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It only states the action (delete) without mentioning side effects, permissions, error handling, or whether deletion is soft or hard.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise at six words, front-loading the purpose. However, it might be too brief, missing opportunities to add value without being verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite the tool's simplicity, the description fails to provide complete context. It does not explain the return value, success criteria, or any dependencies, leaving the agent with insufficient information for confident invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with the 'id' parameter described as 'Activity ID.' The description does not add any additional meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Delete an activity by ID,' specifying the verb (delete) and resource (activity). It distinguishes from the sibling 'activities_bulk_delete' by implying single-item deletion via ID.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'activities_bulk_delete' or contextual prerequisites. The description implies usage for deleting a single activity but lacks explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use instructions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/iamsamuelfraga/mcp-pipedrive'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server