organizations_delete
Delete an organization from Pipedrive CRM by providing its unique ID.
Instructions
Delete an organization by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Organization ID |
Delete an organization from Pipedrive CRM by providing its unique ID.
Delete an organization by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Organization ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must bear the full burden. It only states 'delete', implying a destructive action, but does not disclose whether it is irreversible, what happens to related data, or any required permissions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence that is front-loaded and free of unnecessary words. It efficiently conveys the core action, though it could be slightly more informative.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple one-parameter delete tool, the description provides the essential information. However, it lacks details on reversibility, error behavior, and differentiation from bulk delete, making it somewhat incomplete for an agent's decision-making.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% description coverage for the single parameter 'id'. The description adds no meaning beyond the schema, just restating 'by ID'. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (delete) and resource (organization) with the identifier method (by ID). However, it does not differentiate from siblings like organizations_bulk_delete, which is a similar action but for multiple organizations.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not specify when to use this tool versus other deletion tools (e.g., bulk delete) or mention any prerequisites or side effects.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/iamsamuelfraga/mcp-pipedrive'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server