Skip to main content
Glama
chandshy
by chandshy

Get Proton Pass Item

pass_get
Destructive

Retrieve a Proton Pass item by ID and obtain its decrypted secret fields, such as passwords and TOTP. Each call is audit-logged for security.

Instructions

Retrieve a single Proton Pass item by ID, INCLUDING its decrypted secret fields (password, TOTP, note body). Every call is audit-logged. Prefer pass_list / pass_search for non-credential lookups.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
item_idYesItem ID from pass_list or pass_search
account_idNoOptional account ID to route this call to (multi-account configs). Omit to use the active account. Configured account IDs are listed in the settings UI (Accounts tab).

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes
urlNo
nameYes
noteNo
typeYes
fieldsNoExtra string fields parsed from the Pass entry body. Omitted entirely when the entry has none — clients must treat `fields` as optional, not always-present.
usernameNo
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations include destructiveHint: true, but the description adds context by noting every call is audit-logged, which justifies the destructive hint and provides additional behavioral insight beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two efficient sentences front-load the core purpose and include a usage guideline. No extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, usage guidance, and audit-log side effect. With an output schema present, return value details are unnecessary. Slightly missing potential error scenarios but overall sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema already covers both parameters with clear descriptions (100% coverage). The tool description does not add new semantic information beyond what the schema provides, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves a single Proton Pass item by ID, including decrypted secret fields, and distinguishes it from pass_list/pass_search via explicit preference.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit guidance: 'Prefer pass_list / pass_search for non-credential lookups', telling the agent when to use this tool versus alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/chandshy/mailpouch'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server