Get SimpleLogin Alias Activity

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true. The description adds behavioral context: it returns activity log with most recent ordering and focuses on forward/block/reply events. This meets the expectation for adding value beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that communicates purpose and use case without any unnecessary words or fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema and the tool's focused nature, the description covers the return type (activity log), ordering, and a typical use case. It could mention pagination behavior more explicitly, but it sufficiently sets expectations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 67%, which is moderate. The description does not add extra detail about parameters beyond what the schema provides; it only implies that 'aliasId' refers to a single alias. The schema covers 'pageSize' and 'account_id' with descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Return forward/block/reply activity log for a single SimpleLogin alias (most recent first)', specifying the verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like alias_list (lists aliases) and alias_delete (deletes).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a use case: 'Useful for auditing what's hitting a specific alias before you disable or delete it.' This gives clear guidance on when to use the tool, though it does not explicitly mention alternative tools for other scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.