Skip to main content
Glama
chandshy

mailpouch

by chandshy
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Get Server Logs

get_logs
Read-only

Retrieve recent log entries filtered by level, with sensitive fields automatically redacted. Use to audit or debug server activity by selecting debug, info, warn, or error levels.

Instructions

Retrieve recent server log entries filtered by level. Sensitive fields are redacted.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
levelNoFilter by log level
limitNoMax entries (max 500)
account_idNoOptional account ID to route this call to (multi-account configs). Omit to use the active account. Configured account IDs are listed in the settings UI (Accounts tab).

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
logsYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv3.1.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / account_id
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Optional account ID to route this call to (multi-account configs). Omit to use the active account. Configured account IDs are listed in the settings UI (Accounts tab).",
+  "type": "string"
+}
  2. First observedv3.0.77

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=true, and the description adds that sensitive fields are redacted, disclosing a behavioral trait beyond what annotations provide. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that front-loads the core purpose. No extraneous words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

All three parameters are documented in the schema, an output schema exists, and the description covers the key behavioral aspect (redaction). For a simple read tool, this is sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description adds little beyond what the schema already provides. It mentions filtering by level but doesn't elaborate further.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Retrieve'), the resource ('server log entries'), and key details (filtering by level, redaction). It is distinct from sibling tools which operate on emails, aliases, etc.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention when not to use it or provide context for selection among siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools