mailpouch
Related Servers
Alternatives to mailpouch
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA self-hosted MCP server that gives AI agents full email superpowers.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA local MCP server that unifies email and calendar management across multiple providers, enabling AI agents to search, read, and write with explicit approval and local-first security.1Apache 2.0

fagents-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables Claude Code agents to send and read emails via SMTP/IMAP with per-agent credential isolation and audit logging.MIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server providing AI agents a scoped, read-and-draft-only view into Proton Mail via Proton Bridge, with code-enforced restrictions preventing external access or sending.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI coding agents access to ProtonMail via Proton Bridge, enabling secure search, read, draft, and send of emails while keeping decrypted mail local.884 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA self-hosted, multi-mailbox MCP server that exposes IMAP/SMTP operations as tools for AI agents, enabling email management like listing folders, reading, searching, sending, and moving messages via natural language.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 66 tools
Each tool serves a clearly distinct purpose, with well-defined differences between single and bulk operations, folder vs label moves, and explicit convenience wrappers. Overlaps like move_email and its convenience variants are documented as such, so agents can confidently select the right tool.
All tool names use a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case, with modifiers like 'bulk_' or 'check_' for clarity. Even convenience wrappers follow the pattern (e.g., move_to_trash, archive_email). No mixing of conventions or ambiguous verbs.
With 66 tools, the count is well above the recommended range for a coherent set. While many tools are justifiable for the domain, the proliferation of convenience wrappers (e.g., archive_email, move_to_trash) and separate bulk variants bloats the surface unnecessarily, making it harder for agents to navigate.
The tool set covers the full email lifecycle: CRUD, labels, folders, search, scheduling, reminders, contacts, analytics, and server management. Minor gaps exist, such as the absence of a single-email permanent deletion (only bulk empty_trash) and no tool for managing filters or rules, but these are reasonable omissions for a personal email server.