Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mailpouch

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A self-hosted MCP server that gives an AI client read, search, triage, drafting, attachment/export and label-management access to several Gmail or Google Workspace accounts at once, with each call naming an explicit account. Sending is disabled unless armed twice, mail deletion is impossible, and tokens, exports and audit data stay local.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A self-hosted MCP server that gives AI agents full email superpowers.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that unifies email and calendar management across multiple providers, enabling AI agents to search, read, and write with explicit approval and local-first security.
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables Claude Code agents to send and read emails via SMTP/IMAP with per-agent credential isolation and audit logging.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server providing AI agents a scoped, read-and-draft-only view into Proton Mail via Proton Bridge, with code-enforced restrictions preventing external access or sending.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives AI coding agents access to ProtonMail via Proton Bridge, enabling secure search, read, draft, and send of emails while keeping decrypted mail local.
      8
      17 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 66 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a clearly distinct purpose, with well-defined differences between single and bulk operations, folder vs label moves, and explicit convenience wrappers. Overlaps like move_email and its convenience variants are documented as such, so agents can confidently select the right tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case, with modifiers like 'bulk_' or 'check_' for clarity. Even convenience wrappers follow the pattern (e.g., move_to_trash, archive_email). No mixing of conventions or ambiguous verbs.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 66 tools, the count is well above the recommended range for a coherent set. While many tools are justifiable for the domain, the proliferation of convenience wrappers (e.g., archive_email, move_to_trash) and separate bulk variants bloats the surface unnecessarily, making it harder for agents to navigate.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the full email lifecycle: CRUD, labels, folders, search, scheduling, reminders, contacts, analytics, and server management. Minor gaps exist, such as the absence of a single-email permanent deletion (only bulk empty_trash) and no tool for managing filters or rules, but these are reasonable omissions for a personal email server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSlow