sequencer-strip_add

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must carry the full burden of behavioral transparency. It only says 'Add', implying creation, but it does not disclose what happens if the strip already exists, whether it modifies existing strips, or any side effects. The description provides minimal insight beyond the action itself.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence that is front-loaded and efficient. There is no wasted wording or unnecessary detail. However, its brevity borders on under-specification, but for conciseness alone it scores well.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 5 parameters and no output schema, the description is notably incomplete. It does not explain how the parameters (e.g., type, path, channel) affect the created strip, nor does it clarify any constraints. The description leaves the agent guessing about input requirements and expected results.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema defines 5 parameters (name, path, type, channel, frame_start), but the description provides zero information about them. Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description fails to add any meaning beyond the schema. The agent receives no hints about parameter relationships, defaults, or required formats.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Add a sequence strip' uses a specific verb (Add) and resource (sequence strip), clearly distinguishing this from sibling operations like sequencer-strip_remove and sequencer-strip_set. However, it does not elaborate on what constitutes a sequence strip or the types of strips it can add, but the core purpose is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention any prerequisites, restrictions, or context in which the tool is appropriate or unsuitable. The description simply states the action without directing the agent on selection among the many sequencer-related tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.