outliner-parent_clear

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden of disclosing behavior. It explicitly mentions the default transform preservation, which is a key side effect. However, it does not elaborate on what happens when keep_transform is false or other potential consequences, but for a simple unparent operation it is reasonably transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, precise sentence that conveys the action and default behavior without any unnecessary words or repetition. It is perfectly concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple operation, the description provides enough context for an AI to understand the purpose and default behavior. It does not explain error handling or edge cases, but given the simplicity, it is sufficiently complete for typical usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers both parameters and their titles already convey most of the meaning (object, keep_transform = Preserve world transform). The description reinforces the default but adds little beyond what the schema provides, aligning with the baseline for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (clearing an object's parent) and adds the key detail about preserving world transform by default. It is specific and distinguishable from sibling tools like outliner-parent_set and outliner-object_unlink.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

While the description implies when to use the tool (when you need to remove a parent-child relationship), it does not explicitly contrast with alternatives like parent_set or object_unlink. It lacks explicit guidance on when not to use it, so it is adequate but not highly informative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.