camera-create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral transparency. It only states the basic creation action and does not disclose side effects (e.g., what happens to the previous active camera) or any prerequisites. This is insufficient for a tool with 9 configurable parameters.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded with the main verb and includes the key optional behavior, making it appropriately concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (9 parameters) and absence of annotations, the description is too sparse to be considered complete. It does not explain how the camera is added to the scene, the meaning of unspecified parameters, or any constraints, leaving agents without essential context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description fails to compensate for the 9 parameters. The only implicit reference is to the 'active' parameter, which provides minimal semantics beyond what the schema already indicates with its title. The description adds little value over the schema itself.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a camera and optionally sets it as the active scene camera, using a specific verb ('Create') and resource ('camera'). This distinguishes it from siblings like camera-set or camera-set_active, which imply modification rather than creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context that this tool is for creating a new camera, implying it should be used when a new camera object is needed. However, it does not explicitly mention alternatives for editing existing cameras, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.