app-workspace_set

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states the action but does not mention side effects (e.g., losing unsaved state), permissions required, or whether the switch is immediate and persistent. It lacks any detail beyond the obvious action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It is appropriately concise for a simple operation, though it could include additional context without being verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple switch operation, the description is minimally viable but lacks important context such as how to list available workspaces (e.g., via 'app-workspaces') or what happens if an invalid name is given. Given the absence of output schema and annotations, it could be more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has one parameter 'name' with no description, and schema coverage is 0%. The description adds only the phrase 'named workspace', which provides minimal context. It does not clarify the expected format of the name, how to retrieve valid names, or any constraints (e.g., exact match vs partial match).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (switch active window) and the target (named workspace), which is specific and unambiguous. It does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'app-workspaces' (likely listing), but the verb 'switch' distinguishes the intent well.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention that workspace names can be discovered via 'app-workspaces' or any prerequisites or context for switching. No exclusions or conditions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.