Api solutions object retrieve

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description says solutions can be 'edited', which directly contradicts the readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false annotations. It adds no useful behavioral context about the lookup or return value beyond what the annotations already provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence with no padding, but it is generic boilerplate rather than front-loaded, actionable information. Its brevity does not compensate for its ambiguity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter retrieve tool, the description omits key context: what the id refers to, what kind of solution object is returned, and how this differs from sibling list/retrieve endpoints. Annotations cover safety, but the description remains incomplete for selection and invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single required parameter has 0% schema description coverage, and the description never explains that id identifies a specific solution. The parameter name 'id' is somewhat self-evident, but no format or lookup semantics are added.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the resource ('solutions') but the verb is ambiguous: 'viewed or edited' does not clearly identify a retrieve operation. It also fails to distinguish this tool from sibling tools such as ciso_assistant_api_solutions_retrieve or ciso_assistant_api_solutions_list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, and no mention of the required id or retrieval context. The phrase 'viewed or edited' is actively misleading because the annotations declare this as read-only.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.