Api questions create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, idempotentHint=false, openWorldHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds nothing beyond that — no mention of required permissions, what the body must contain, validation failures, or what a successful create returns.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single six-word sentence is short but not efficient, since it conveys almost no information. This is under-specification rather than conciseness — the one sentence present does not earn its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a write tool with an opaque free-form body, no output schema, and no annotations beyond generic hints. An agent cannot determine the required payload or the effect of calling it, making the definition insufficient for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the sole parameter is an untyped 'body' object with additionalProperties=true. The description provides no field names, no required fields, and no payload shape for creating a Question, leaving the agent with no way to construct a valid call.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description restates the tool name almost verbatim ('API endpoint for Question CRUD') without specifying that this particular endpoint creates a Question. Listing 'CRUD' generically is actively unhelpful given siblings named questions_list, questions_retrieve, questions_update, questions_partial_update, and questions_destroy, which each cover one of those CRUD operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no statement of when to use this tool versus questions_update, questions_partial_update, or questions_create alternatives such as the batch action endpoint. The verb 'create' is only inferable from the tool name, not from the description text.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.