Api security advisories create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, openWorldHint=true, idempotentHint=false, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is structural, not textual. The description adds nothing beyond that — no note on what gets persisted, duplicate behavior, or side effects of creating an advisory record.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is a single short sentence, but that brevity comes from under-specification rather than economy: the sentence conveys no actionable information and is generic Django REST boilerplate rather than front-loaded purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with a free-form body parameter, no output schema, and no field documentation anywhere, the description should explain the request payload and the resulting record. It is too thin to let an agent invoke the tool correctly, even though the annotations cover the read/write safety signal.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is a single 'body' parameter with 0% schema description coverage and an untyped anyOf object, so the schema tells the agent nothing about what fields an advisory requires. The description does not compensate at all — it never mentions the request payload, required fields, or content shape, so an agent cannot construct a valid call.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description says security advisories can be "viewed or edited," which restates the resource but never states that this tool creates a new advisory. The sibling set already contains separate retrieve/list/update/destroy tools, so the absence of a clear 'create' verb leaves the agent unable to distinguish it from ciso_assistant_api_security_advisories_update.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no statement of when to use this rather than ciso_assistant_api_security_advisories_update, _partial_update, _list, or _retrieve, and no prerequisites or authentication context. The agent must infer usage entirely from the tool name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.