Api question choices update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds nothing beyond that — no mention of whether omitted fields are cleared (full replace vs partial), permission requirements, or what happens to choices attached to questions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short sentence with no padding, so nothing is wasted — but it is under-specified rather than concise, and there is no front-loaded verb or scope detail to anchor it.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

A mutation endpoint with undocumented free-form body, no output schema, and 0% schema coverage requires the description to carry real weight. 'API endpoint for QuestionChoice CRUD' tells an agent essentially nothing needed to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% for two parameters. The 'body' parameter is a free-form object with additionalProperties:true, meaning the schema gives no hint about which QuestionChoice fields are accepted, and the description does not compensate at all.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description restates the name and title: 'QuestionChoice CRUD' names the resource but the tool is specifically the update operation, which only the tool name conveys. It does not distinguish this from the numerous sibling question_choices endpoints (create, destroy, partial_update, retrieve, list).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this versus ciso_assistant_api_question_choices_partial_update or the batch_action_create sibling. An agent must infer from the suffix alone that this is a full update requiring a complete body.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.