Api question choices partial update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare this is a non-readOnly, non-destructive, non-idempotent, open-world mutation. The description adds no behavioral context such as which fields are mutable, whether omitted fields remain unchanged, or what authorization is required. It does not contradict the annotations, but it contributes nothing beyond them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The single sentence is short, but it is under-specified rather than concise. It spends its only sentence on a generic 'CRUD' label that does not help an agent invoke the tool correctly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation endpoint with two parameters and no output schema, the description should at minimum identify the operation and payload semantics. Instead it provides only the resource name and 'CRUD', leaving critical invocation details completely absent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% for two parameters. The description mentions no parameters at all and does not explain that 'id' identifies the target QuestionChoice or that 'body' contains the partial update payload. An agent must guess the meaning and structure of the body object.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description restates the resource name and the generic acronym 'CRUD' without identifying the specific operation. It does not distinguish this partial-update endpoint from sibling operations like create, destroy, list, or retrieve, so an agent cannot tell what this tool uniquely does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance, no mention of prerequisites, and no comparison to alternatives. The agent is left to infer that 'partial update' means modifying an existing QuestionChoice from the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.