Api document revisions object retrieve

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, but the description claims the endpoint allows revisions to be 'viewed or edited', which suggests a write capability this tool does not have. Apart from that, it adds no behavioral context such as permission requirements or what a revision record contains.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is a single short sentence with no padding, but that brevity comes from generic boilerplate rather than deliberate front-loading, and the misleading 'or edited' clause is the only content beyond the name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Placeholder: not used.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single `id` parameter has 0% schema description coverage, and the description does not compensate: it never states that `id` is the document revision identifier, nor its format (UUID vs integer). An agent must guess where to obtain the value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description says the endpoint allows document revisions to be 'viewed', which implies a single-object read, but the boilerplate 'or edited' muddies whether this is a read or a write tool. Several siblings exist (document_revisions_retrieve, document_revisions_list, document_revisions_object_retrieve), and nothing distinguishes this one from them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no statement of when to use this tool versus document_revisions_retrieve, document_revisions_list, or document_revisions_object_retrieve. No prerequisites (e.g., needing a revision ID from the list endpoint) are mentioned, so the agent must infer usage entirely from the name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.