Api settings general set default dashboard create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered, but the description adds almost nothing beyond restating that this is a partial update. It does not say what happens to fields omitted from the body, whether the change is immediate and global, or whether elevated permissions are required for a settings-level mutation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with zero filler and no repetition of the title. It is efficient, though the brevity reflects under-specification rather than disciplined editing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a mutation of a settings value with no annotations beyond the default hints, no output schema, and a completely undocumented payload. For an agent to call it correctly it needs the body shape and scope, neither of which the description provides.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the single 'body' parameter is a free-form anyOf object with no shape at all. The description names the key being set, which hints the body should contain something like that key, but it never specifies the expected payload structure, accepted value types, or whether body=null has meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb (partial update) and a specific settings key (default_custom_analytics_dashboard), which is more than the title offers. However, it never clarifies the scope of the setting – global instance setting vs. per-user preference – and does not distinguish it from the sibling ciso_assistant_api_settings_general_partial_update, which could plausibly perform the same change.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no statement of when to use this tool, no prerequisites, and no pointer to the sibling retrieval tool (settings_general_default_custom_analytics_dashboard_retrieve) for reading the current value. The agent must infer usage entirely from the name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.