Api contracts cascade info retrieve

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. However, the description adds no behavioral context beyond those annotations — it does not explain what 'cascade preview' returns, what the id references, or any other relevant behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

At two words, the description is technically concise but severely under-specified. It lacks front-loaded useful information and does not earn its place as a functional tool description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a retrieve tool with a required identifier and no output schema, the description is completely inadequate. It does not explain the tool's purpose, what a cascade preview contains, or how the id is used, leaving the agent with essentially no information to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% for the single required 'id' parameter. The description provides no meaning for 'id' at all, leaving the agent unable to determine whether it is a contract id, cascade id, or something else.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is only 'Cascade preview:' — it does not state a specific verb or fully describe the resource. It hints at a preview related to cascades but leaves the actual operation ambiguous, failing to distinguish it from the many sibling 'cascade_info_retrieve' tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention any sibling tool, prerequisites, or scenarios where this cascade preview should be selected.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.