ciso_assistant_api_settings_general_default_language_retrieve_2Retrieves the default language configured in CISO Assistant general API settings, helping you confirm or integrate the platform's localization preference.
api_settings_general_default_language_retrieve_2
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v2.3.6Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint and destructiveHint=false, so safety is covered by structured data. The description adds nothing beyond that—no note on auth requirements, what object is fetched, or whether the result is a raw language code.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
It is short, but shortness here is under-specification, not concision—the single token-length string conveys no information beyond the name. Nothing is front-loaded because there is no content.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema exists, so the description should say what is returned (e.g. a language code / locale object). With an identically named sibling in the list, the missing differentiation is a real gap.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool takes zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate; baseline 4 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description is a verbatim restatement of the tool name, only weakly implying 'retrieve the default language setting'. It never states in prose what the tool returns or how it differs from the near-identical sibling ciso_assistant_api_settings_general_default_language_retrieve.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or prerequisite information. Crucially it does not explain why this _2 variant exists alongside ciso_assistant_api_settings_general_default_language_retrieve, leaving the agent unable to choose between them.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.