Api pmbok responsibility roles cascade info retrieve

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description's "preview" implies a dry-run style inspection of cascade effects (likely what would be deleted/affected), which is modest added context, but it does not say what the preview returns or how it relates to destructive cascade operations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two words and a colon is short but severely under-specified rather than concise; there is no front-loaded statement of purpose beyond a fragment.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only, single-parameter tool with no output schema, the description leaves the agent unable to predict the response shape or distinguish it from the plain roles retrieve sibling. Annotations carry the safety profile, but the semantic payload is effectively absent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% for the single required `id` parameter, so the description must compensate and does not: it never says whether `id` is the responsibility role's UUID, a matrix id, or a project id. The only hint is the ambient tool name.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

"Cascade preview:" restates a fragment of the tool name (cascade_info) and adds only the word "preview", without naming the resource being previewed (PMBOK responsibility roles) or what a cascade preview contains. An agent must rely entirely on the tool name to know this concerns responsibility-role cascade impact.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no statement of when to call this versus the many sibling cascade_info_retrieve tools (journeys, actors, folders, etc.) or versus the plain roles retrieve/object_retrieve siblings. Usage is only implied by the name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.