Api loaded libraries list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, destructiveHint=false and openWorldHint, so safety is covered. The description adds no behavioral context of its own—nothing about pagination, filtering semantics, or what 'optimized data' means for the response—and its content is developer-facing noise rather than agent-facing disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is a single short sentence, so not bloated, but the sentence is consumed by an implementation note ('override the list method') that earns no place in a tool description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

A 13-parameter collection endpoint with no output schema, no parameter documentation, and no description of return shape or filtering behavior. The description leaves virtually everything an agent needs unstated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are 13 parameters with 0% schema description coverage and no types or enums documented, so the schema provides essentially no guidance. The description supplies nothing about id, urn, limit, offset, search, ordering, packager, provider, has_update, version, locale, object_type or max_pages, leaving the agent to guess each one.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description ('Override the list method to inject optimized data into the serializer context') describes an internal Django implementation detail rather than what the tool does for a caller. Only the word 'list' hints that it returns a collection, and it never states that the resource is loaded libraries or what the caller gets back.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No indication of when to call this versus the many sibling list/retrieve tools (e.g. ciso_assistant_api_loaded_libraries_retrieve, _object_retrieve, _tree_retrieve). No prerequisites, no exclusions, no alternatives named.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.