Api presets publish draft preview create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=false and openWorldHint=true, but the description adds no behavioral context at all — nothing about side effects, whether the 'preview' mutates state, or what authorization is required. With a name implying both write and preview semantics, the burden was high and the description is silent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

No wasted words, but only because there is no content — the entire description is an underscore-delimited slug. It is under-specified rather than concise, and nothing is front-loaded because nothing is said.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has a mutation-adjacent annotation profile, no output schema, and an undocumented required id. Given that complexity, a description consisting solely of the tool name is completely inadequate for an agent to invoke it correctly or understand the return value.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% for the single required 'id' parameter. The description does not state whether the id identifies the preset, the draft, or a revision, which is exactly the ambiguity the schema leaves open. The parameter name is only mildly self-explanatory.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is a verbatim restatement of the tool identifier 'api_presets_publish_draft_preview_create' with no added explanation. An agent learns nothing about what a preview of a preset draft publish actually produces or how it differs from the sibling 'ciso_assistant_api_presets_publish_draft_create'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance whatsoever about when to call this preview endpoint versus the actual publish tool, nor any prerequisite context (e.g. that a draft must first exist via start_editing/save_draft). Usage must be inferred entirely from the name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.