ciso_assistant_api_folders_import_dummy_createCreates dummy folders through the API to enable testing of import functionality or to set up initial folder structures.
API endpoint that allows folders to be viewed or edited.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v2.3.6Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already specify readOnlyHint=false, openWorldHint=true, idempotentHint=false, and destructiveHint=false. The description adds no behavioral context about what 'dummy import' means, whether it creates real data, or what side effects occur, so it fails to enrich the annotation profile.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
It is a single sentence, but the sentence is generic and does not front-load actionable information about the tool's specific purpose. Every sentence should earn its place, and this one does not.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description is incomplete for a create endpoint: it never explains what a 'dummy import' is, what gets created, or how this differs from related folder tools. With no output schema and only sparse annotations, the description should carry more explanatory weight.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters and the schema is empty, so the baseline is 4. The description does not contradict or need to explain parameters, though it also provides no additional parameter context.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description says only that it is an API endpoint for viewing or editing folders, which is a generic restatement of the title and does not convey what 'import dummy create' actually does. It fails to distinguish this tool from siblings like folders_import_create or folders_create.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or exclusions. The description gives no usage context beyond a generic endpoint summary.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.