Api iam revoke sessions create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=false and openWorldHint=true, so the description only needs to add context. It does add the important 'except the current one' carve-out, but leaves a real ambiguity: whether 'all other user sessions' means the caller's own other sessions or every user's sessions, and what happens to targets.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, front-loaded with the verb and scope. The lead-in 'An endpoint for' is filler that could be dropped, but nothing else is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no parameters, no output schema, and annotations covering the safety profile, the description supplies most of what an agent needs. The only missing piece is disambiguating whose sessions are revoked and how it differs from the sibling logoutall endpoint.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters and the description does not invent any, so there is nothing to mis-document. Baseline for a no-param tool applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (revoking) and resource (all other user sessions) with a clear scope qualifier, 'except the current one.' It does not, however, distinguish itself from the closely related sibling ciso_assistant_api_iam_logoutall_create, which an agent could easily confuse with this endpoint.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the situation (revoke everything except the current session) but never states when to prefer this over the sibling logout/logoutall endpoints, nor any preconditions. Usage is inferable but not guided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.