smartsheet_get_workspace

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It only states the action without addressing permissions, error handling, or side effects. The tool appears to be read-only, but this is not explicitly stated. The description lacks transparency about what happens on failure or the response format.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (one sentence) and front-loaded. While concise, it omits important details that could be included without expanding much, such as a brief note on the include or load_all parameters. It earns its place but is under-specified for the tool's complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 3 parameters, no output schema, and many sibling tools, the description is incomplete. It fails to explain the return value, differentiate from similar tools, or provide usage context. The include and load_all parameters are not elaborated upon, leaving the agent without enough information to use the tool effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage for all three parameters (workspace_id, include, load_all). The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so it meets the baseline of 3. No extra context is given about the include flags or the meaning of load_all beyond the schema's descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves a workspace and its top-level contents, distinguishing it from siblings like smartsheet_get_workspace_metadata (which returns only metadata) and smartsheet_list_workspaces (which lists all workspaces). The verb 'get' and resource 'workspace and top-level contents' are specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as smartsheet_get_workspace_metadata or smartsheet_list_workspaces. There is no mention of prerequisites, context for choosing between this and other workspace-related tools, or when to use the include or load_all parameters.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.