hosting_listAccountDatabaseRemoteConnectionsV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It transparently states that it returns rules and includes the detail that rules for databases not assigned to any domain are always included. Lacks information about pagination or limits, but is generally clear.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, each serving a distinct purpose. Front-loaded with the main action, then additional filtering guidance. No redundancy or unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema is provided, and the description does not detail the structure of the returned rules (e.g., fields like host, database, etc.). For a list tool, this omission leaves some uncertainty about what exactly is returned.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but the description adds value by explaining the domain filter's behavior (including unassigned databases). The username parameter is not elaborated beyond the schema, but the overall context is sufficient.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns remote-access rules for a specified account, specifying the included hosts (IPv4/IPv6 addresses or '%'). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like hosting_createAccountDatabaseRemoteConnectionV1 and hosting_deleteAccountDatabaseRemoteConnectionV1 by focusing on listing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains when to use the domain filter, but does not explicitly state when not to use this tool or name alternatives. However, the context of siblings implies that modifications require other tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.