hosting_deleteAccountDatabaseRemoteConnectionV1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description says 'Permanently removes', indicating irreversibility, but lacks details on side effects like impact on ongoing connections or required permissions. Adequate but could be more explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with main action. No fluff, every sentence is informative and earned its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a straightforward delete tool with 100% schema coverage and no output schema, the description adequately explains inputs and prerequisites. Could mention error handling or idempotency but not required.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, baseline 3. Description adds context by referencing the list endpoints for exact values, reinforcing schema descriptions but not adding new semantic information beyond what schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it 'Permanently removes a remote-access rule' and 'revoking the given host's remote access'. Verb-resource pair is explicit and distinguishes from sibling tools like create or list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit guidance on how to identify the rule using the exact ip from list endpoints and using the full database name from list databases. No explicit when-not-to-use, but the destructive nature implies careful use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.