builds__individual_testers__remove

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare destructive=true and idempotent=true, and the description adds the HTTP DELETE method and exact relationship path. However, it does not disclose side effects, such as whether the tester is also removed from other contexts or if the operation is reversible.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single succinct sentence that immediately states the action, endpoint, and target. It avoids redundancy with the schema and annotations, earning a perfect score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete relationship operation, the description, combined with the detailed schema and annotations, is sufficient. It specifies the exact endpoint and action, and the schema covers the request body. A minor gap is not mentioning the expected response, but this does not hamper completion for a straightforward delete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides full descriptions for both parameters, including 'ID from the matching list call.' The description itself adds no parameter-level details, aligning with the high schema coverage baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Unlink' targeting 'individual testers' from a 'build,' which clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like builds__individual_testers__add and builds__individual_testers__list. The inclusion of the DELETE endpoint further clarifies the operation type.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the usage context (removing individual testers from a build) but does not explicitly mention alternatives or exclusions. The verb 'Unlink' and the presence of sibling add/list tools make the intended use clear, though explicit guidance would strengthen it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.