alternative_distribution_package_versions__deltas__list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, covering safety. The description adds the behavioral context of listing deltas for a version but does not explain pagination behavior or what the response contains. With annotations present, the description adds marginal value but not rich detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence plus the API path. Perfectly front-loaded with the purpose. No extraneous words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with fully described schema parameters. However, there is no output schema, and the description does not hint at the response structure (e.g., a list of delta objects). Pagination is implied by parameters but not explained. Adequate but not complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema coverage is 100%, so parameters (id, limit, next_url) are fully documented. The description does not add any additional meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'List' and the resource 'deltas' with the parent 'alternative distribution package version'. The API path supports this. Among siblings, there are tools like `alternative_distribution_package_deltas__get` (single delta) and `alternative_distribution_package_versions__variants__list` (listing variants), so this tool is clearly distinguished as listing deltas for a version.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like `alternative_distribution_package_deltas__get` (for a single delta) or other list tools. No exclusions or context about prerequisites are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.