app_store_version_localizations__delete

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and readOnlyHint=false. The description adds no extra behavioral context such as side-effects, permissions, rate limits, or irreversibility. It merely restates what the annotation already conveys, offering no added value beyond the endpoint.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: one action sentence plus the endpoint. It is front-loaded, contains no filler, and every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple (one required parameter, no output schema) and annotations cover the destructive nature. However, the description does not mention what happens to associated resources (e.g., screenshots, previews) or what response to expect, leaving some ambiguity for an agent unfamiliar with the API.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema fully documents the single 'id' parameter with 'ID from the matching list call.' The description adds no parameter-specific information, but with 100% schema coverage, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Delete') and the specific resource ('App Store version localization'), and includes the REST endpoint for precision. This distinguishes it from sibling tools that create, update, or get the same resource.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage: use this when deleting a specific localization. However, it provides no explicit guidance on when to use it versus alternatives (e.g., update or create), nor does it mention any prerequisites or consequences. The schema's 'ID from the matching list call' is the only hint.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.