beta_groups__list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations clearly indicate the tool is read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive. The description adds the HTTP path but no additional behavioral traits like pagination behavior, rate limits, or result size limits. With annotations present, the bar is lower, but the description still lacks extra context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: one sentence plus the path. No wasted words, front-loaded with the action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (12 parameters, no output schema), the description is minimal. It does not mention that the response is a paginated list, nor hints at the structure. However, the schema covers filtering and sorting, so it is partially complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 100% description coverage for all 12 parameters, so the baseline is 3. The description does not add any parameter information beyond what is in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('List') and resource ('beta groups'), and includes the HTTP method and path, making it specific. However, it does not differentiate from sibling list endpoints like apps__beta_groups__list or beta_testers__beta_groups__list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternative list endpoints. No exclusions, prerequisites, or context for usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.