app_store_version_experiments_v2__update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds no behavioral context beyond what annotations already provide. Annotations indicate idempotent and not destructive, but the description does not explain partial update semantics (PATCH), authentication needs, or any side effects. Minimal added value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise: one sentence plus HTTP method. It is front-loaded with the core action. However, it could be more informative without adding length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has a nested input schema with 2 parameters, but no output schema. The description does not explain return values. The schema is fully documented, so the description is adequate but not complete for understanding the full scope of the operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description provides no additional meaning for parameters, merely naming the operation. No parameter-specific clarification is given.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update an App Store version experiments (v2)', specifying the verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create, delete, and get by verb. However, it does not elaborate on scope or differentiate from other update tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage context or when to use vs alternatives is provided. There is no mention of prerequisites, when to use update versus create or other tools, or any conditions for invocation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.