app_info_localizations__get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false. The description adds only 'by ID', which is already covered by the schema. No additional behavioral context such as response format, rate limits, or relationship expansion effects is provided, so it adds little beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with an endpoint reference. It is front-loaded with the primary purpose and contains no unnecessary words or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple get-by-ID tool, the description plus schema covers the essential information. The include and fields parameters for controlling response content are documented in the schema. The lack of an output schema is somewhat mitigated by the clear resource type from the name and endpoint. A minor gap is the absence of any statement about the returned resource shape, but overall it is adequately complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%: all three parameters (id, include, fields_appInfoLocalizations) have descriptions. The tool description itself adds no parameter semantics, so it meets the baseline but does not enhance understanding beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Read one app info localization by ID', which clearly specifies the action (read), the resource (app info localization), and the scope (by ID). The endpoint [GET /v1/appInfoLocalizations/{id}] reinforces the purpose and distinguishes it from create/update/delete/list siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. The only hint is in the id parameter description ('ID from the matching list call'), which is not part of the main tool description. No exclusions or alternative tool names are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.