Skip to main content
Glama
erayendes

Heimdall App Store Connect MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to Heimdall App Store Connect MCP

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    MCP server for App Store Connect API with 208 tools across 25 workers. Manage apps, builds, TestFlight, in-app purchases, subscriptions, reviews, provisioning, screenshots, analytics, and more — directly from Claude, Cursor, VS Code, or any MCP client. Multi-account support, worker filtering, JWT auth.
    69
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol server that exposes the entire Apple App Store Connect API (1,200+ operations) as MCP tools, enabling AI assistants to query apps, manage builds, handle submissions, read analytics, and more.
    9 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that connects Cursor, Claude Desktop, and other MCP clients to the official App Store Connect API—so you can manage iOS/macOS apps, TestFlight, in-app subscriptions, and store metadata via chat or automated tool calls.
    69
    83 npm
    13
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    An MCP server that exposes the Apple App Store Connect API to AI agents, enabling management of apps, metadata, in-app purchases, subscriptions, TestFlight, provisioning, reviews, analytics, and more through 113 curated tools plus two generic JSON:API escape-hatch tools.
    2
    -
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    An opinionated MCP server for App Store Connect that provides 13 curated tools, slash-command workflows, and a Claude Skill to manage apps, reviews, sales, and pre-submission audits via natural language.
    41
    72 npm
    MIT

TDQS

B3/5.0

Scored across 353 tools

Disambiguation2/5

Most CRUD tools are distinct on the surface, but dozens of high-level workflow tools deliberately duplicate raw endpoint chains (e.g. release__submit vs review_submissions__create), and many relationship tools carry opaque suffixes that make it hard to tell read vs write or parent vs child at a glance. The descriptions help, but the sheer size of the set makes boundaries unclear.

Naming Consistency2/5

Raw tools mostly follow a resource__action schema, but the pattern is not uniform: verbs are sometimes the last segment (__get, __list, __create) and sometimes embedded (__build__set, __search_keywords__add), while high-level tools use unrelated prefixes like listing__, pricing__, and asc__. Collision-avoidance suffixes such as _0zdb21 and _1vi3gd add further inconsistency.

Tool Count1/5

353 tools is far beyond a practical agent-facing surface and makes selection itself a major failure point. Many low-level relationship getters and high-level summary tools could be consolidated into a much smaller, intentional set.

Completeness4/5

The server covers an unusually broad slice of App Store Connect: apps, builds, beta, review submission, pricing, localizations, analytics, sales, and more. A few gaps remain, such as no explicit update tool for customer review responses and some resources exposed only as relationships, but agents can generally find a viable path through the domain.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessWithin a week