builds__app_store_version__get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds no behavioral traits beyond the annotations (readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false). It does not mention auth requirements, rate limits, or edge cases like missing versions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise: one sentence plus endpoint. No wasted words. The endpoint line might be seen as redundant but is helpful for verification.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, but the description does not explain the return structure. Given the tool's simplicity, it might be acceptable, but missing details on what the response contains (version attributes) reduces completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Parameter schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3 applies. The description does not elaborate on the 'id' or 'include' parameters, leaving their meaning entirely to the schema. No added value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Read the App Store version for a build' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like builds__get and app_store_versions__get by explicitly naming the relationship, though the verb 'read' is less specific than 'get'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like app_store_versions__get or builds__get. The description assumes the agent knows to use this for the build's version, but provides no when-not conditions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.