apps__app_store_versions__list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description aligns with annotations (readOnlyHint: true, idempotentHint: true, destructiveHint: false). It adds context about review state availability in results, which goes beyond what annotations provide. However, it does not disclose other behaviors like pagination or sorting.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence plus the HTTP path, which is very concise. It front-loads the primary purpose. It could be slightly more informative without being verbose, but it avoids unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 9 parameters and no output schema. The description covers the basic purpose but lacks detail on response format, pagination (via limit and next_url), or handling of filters. For a list tool, this is minimally complete but could be enhanced.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description mentions 'review state' which adds minimal value over the enumerated filter states. It does not elaborate on parameter usage beyond what is in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description specifies the action ('List'), the resource ('App Store versions'), and the target ('for an app'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like app_store_versions__get and app_store_versions__create. The review state mention adds specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states the basic purpose but does not provide guidance on when to use this tool vs other list tools (e.g., app_store_versions__app_store_version_localizations__list) or when not to use it. No exclusion criteria or alternatives are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.