apps__beta_testers__remove

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true, so the description's 'Unlink' adds no extra behavioral context. No mention of authorization, rate limits, response format, or consequences of the action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (one sentence plus endpoint) and front-loaded with the action. It is efficient, though it could be slightly more structured with usage hints.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has a nested body parameter and no output schema, yet the description provides no explanation of the body structure or success/error scenarios. It leaves significant gaps for an agent to correctly invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description does not add any parameter meaning beyond the schema, which already describes id as 'Resource identifier' and body as 'JSON:API request body'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Unlink beta testers from an app' uses a specific verb ('Unlink') and clearly identifies the resources (beta testers from an app). It distinguishes from siblings like beta_groups__beta_testers__remove (removes from a group) and beta_testers__apps__remove (removes apps from a tester).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the usage context (removing beta tester-app relationships) but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives or provide any when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.